Editorial: Slots at Chicago O'Hare airport? A tacky choice

The Editorial Board, Chicago Tribune on Jul 25, 2025

Published in Op Eds

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

Pop quiz: How many U.S. airports have slot machines operating among the departure and arrival gates?

The answer is two: Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas and Reno-Tahoe International Airport in Reno. Those airports are in Nevada. Gambling is central to the zeitgeist of that state. People expect the chance to feed bills into slots as they wait out their flight delays.

But savvy gamblers know not to touch these airside temptations, airport slots being notoriously tight, a consequence of convenience and captured customers. Moreover, it’s hard to imagine that whoever is Chicago’s mayor when the epic O’Hare reconstruction is completed will want to be photographed on opening day with Megabucks or Wheel of Fortune machines as their backdrop. That would be tacky.

In global cities outside Nevada, cities showcase airports with fountains, play areas, soaring ceilings, even verdant lounges. They don’t want to be known for trying to take Aunt Sally from Salt Lake City for twenty bucks as she changes planes to one bound for Sarasota.

We understand the aldermanic temptation to squeeze revenue from every corner of Terminal 3, especially if they can plausibly argue the money is not coming from Chicagoans (although that’s a debatable point). Faced with a mayoral administration allergic to any kind of trimming of expenses, aldermen cast around like they’re pulling up couch cushions looking for dimes.

Even aside from the above objections, it’s by no means clear that Chicago would actually make money from airport slots as distinct from syphoning off revenue from a casino that has yet to open. The tax regulations surrounding different kinds of automated ways to lose your money — slots are not the same as video terminals — are complicated and come at varying rates.

Plus we imagine the highly successful Rivers Casino in Des Plaines, just a dice throw from O’Hare, would have a lot to say if airside slots came to pass. And let’s not forget that Rivers coughs up millions in taxes to both Des Plaines and the state of Illinois.

For all of those reasons, we think the ordinance authorizing slots at Chicago’s airports, as introduced by Ald. Gilbert Villegas, 36th, is a losing proposition. At minimum, the city should wait until its new casino opens and a clearer picture emerges of the current state of (legal) gambling in our metro area. In the meantime, aldermen could press the administration to find some ways to cut the city some slack.

_____